Every year in Europe, soils covering an area larger than the city of Berlin are lost to urban sprawl and transport infrastructure. This unsustainable trend threatens the availability of fertile soils and groundwater reservoirs for future generations. A new report made public today by the European Commission recommends a three-tiered approach focused on limiting the progression of soil sealing, mitigating its effects and compensating valuable soil losses by action in other areas.
Environment: Soil sealing in the EU threatens the availability of ecosystem services. European Commission – IP/11/624 23/05/2011
You live on sealed soil
Look out your window. If you do not live isolated in the countryside, it will be difficult that most of which you can see is not sealed floor. Most land around you is covered by buildings or pavement. It is normal, you live in a town or a village. There is much more space out there! Is there much space out there?
Soil sealing occurs when it is covered with impervious surfaces such as asphalt or concrete. These materials are necessary for construction of buildings and road materials, but its use implies the disappearance of agricultural resources and food production, significant changes in the hydrological processes at catchment scales as well as the loss the most important soil functions as habitat and biological support, biomass production, gene pool, sink of greenhouse gases, filtration and transformation of substances and protection of groundwater and the food chain …
Even in cities, unsealed floor areas are necessary. because rain water can not flow through paved surfaces, and the ability of the sewerage system is overloaded.
A problem linked to social inequality
The rapid occupation of land for buildings has become one of the most important environmental problems. Due to migration from rural areas to the big cities and the intense changes of use from the second half of the twentieth century until now, the area of land devoted to agriculture or natural vegetation is declining. And the reasons are obvious: the private economic benefit obtained from construction is much higher than from farming. Besides food products can be imported from other countries. But … is this a sustainable policy? How long?
Just one example: in Andalusia, where I live, land consumption per capita has increased by 4 in the last 50 years, from 87 m2 in 1956 to more than 337 m2 in 2007. Although causes vary from one region to another (industrial and commercial growth, infrastructure construction, mining activities, landfills, etc.), in all cases urban expansion is the main cause of soil sealing.
And it’s not just a problem in the south of Europe. In small countries like Austria, only one third of the land can be used for construction. But urban and industrial expansion continues (the Viennese population grows at a rate of 20,000 people per year), so that in many parts of the country there is not much space and urban planning should be seriously analyzed.
In the EU, At least 275 ha of soil per day were lost, amounting to 1,000 km² per year Between 1990 and 2000, although this trend has been reduced to 252 ha per day in recent years, but the rate of land consumption is still worrying. Between 2000 and 2006, the EU average increase in artificial areas was 3%, with increases attaining 14% in Ireland and Cyprus and 15% in Spain (read more here).
May we get rid of soil sealing?
Obviously, people need to be fed. And for that we need transport infrastructures and consequent soil sealing. We also need infrastructures for the processing of raw materials. As a colleague says, “processes generate structures“. Therefore, we can not do without soil sealing. But we can achieve a balance.
How to? Discovering the causes
The poor generally have access only to areas that have higher risk for health and income generation. And they generally lack the resources to reduce the exposure to the risk or to invest in alleviating the causes of such risk. Environmental degradation therefore can affect the health and nutrition status of the poor and lower their productivity. This can happen both directly through, for example, lower yields per unit of labor or land because of reduced soil quality, and indirectly through the reduced physical capacity of labor to produce because of malnutrition and poor health. Even in cases where the poor are healthy labor productivity can be low due to increased time being allocated to less-productive activities such as fuel wood collection and away from agriculture and other income generating activities.
Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research. CGIAR research priorities for marginal lands. Document No.:SDR/TAC:IAR/99/12.
In current systems, urban population, for which most of these infrastructures are intended, is mostly concentrated in points far from the sources of production. The rural population migrates to cities due to low access to education, health care and, above all, low incomes and job expectations.
Although the consequences of this migration are not as severe (they are) in the so-called First World, the urban agglomeration does not solve these problems. More, it contributes to create large pockets of poverty in the periphery of cities. Here we have an interesting political issue. Are we heading towards a future of smart cities for the ruling class surrounded by belts of hunger, poverty and insecurity?
- Adaku, A.A. 2013. The effect of rural-urban migration on agricultural production in the northern region of Ghana. Journal of Agricultural Science and Applications, 2 (4), pp. 193-201.
- Albrecht, H., Haider, S. 2013. Species diversity and life history traits in calcareous grasslands vary along an urbanization gradient. Biodiversity and Conservation, 22 (10), pp. 2243-2267.
- Ajayi, O.A. 2013. Assessment of agricultural extension agents’ knowledge and attitude towards agricultural insurance in Osun State, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Science and Applications, 2 (3), pp. 143-150.
- Artmann, M. 2014. Assessment of soil sealing management responses, strategies, and targets toward ecologically sustainable Urban land use management. Ambio, 43 (4), pp. 530-541.
- Binns, J.A., Maconachie, R.A., Tanko, A.I. In press. Water, land and health in urban and peri-urban food production: the case of Kano, Nigeria. Land Degradation and Development.
- Ceccarelli, T., Bajocco, S., Perini, L.L., Salvati, L. 2014. Urbanisation and land take of high quality agricultural soils – Exploring long-term land use changes and land capability in Northern Italy. International Journal of Environmental Research, 8 (1), pp. 181-192.
- Doso Jr., S. 2014. Land degradation and agriculture in the Sahel of Africa: causes, impacts and recommendations. Journal of Agricultural Science and Applications, 3 (3), oo. 67-73.
- García, P., Pérez, M.E., Guerra, A. 2014. Using TM images to detect soil sealing change in Madrid (Spain). Geoderma, 214-215, pp. 135-140.
- Gardi, C., Panagos, P., Van Liedekerke, M., Bosco, C., De Brogniez, D. In press. Land take and food security: assessment of land take on the agricultural production in Europe. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.
- Krunić, N., Maksin, M., Milijić, S., Bakić, O., Durdević, J. 2014. Population dynamics and land cover changes of urban areas. Spatium, 1 (31), pp. 22-29.
- Pugliese, L., Scarpetta, S. 2014. An object based analysis applied to very high resolution remote sensing data for the change detection of soil sealing at urban scale. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 26, pp. 155-162.
- Schwendtner, B., Papathoma-Köhle, M., Glade, T. 2014. Risk evolution: How can changes in the built environment influence the potential loss of natural hazards. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13 (9), pp. 2195-2207.
- Su, S., Xiao, R., Zhang, Y. 2014. Monitoring agricultural soil sealing in peri-urban areas using remote sensing. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 80 (4), pp. 367-372.
- Tobias, S. 2013. Preserving ecosystem services in urban regions: Challenges for planning and best practice examples from Switzerland. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 9 (2), pp. 243-251.
- van Wensem, J. 2013. Use of the ecosystem services concept in landscape management in the Netherlands. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 9 (2), pp. 237-242.
- Vasenev, V.I., Stoorvogel, J.J., Vasenev, I.I. 2013. Urban soil organic carbon and its spatial heterogeneity in comparison with natural and agricultural areas in the moscow region. Catena, 107, pp. 96-102.
- Villa, P., Scalenghe, R., Malucelli, F. 2013. Anthropogenic carbon stocks analysis in sparsely urbanized areas using remote sensing: A case study. Joint Urban Remote Sensing Event 2013, JURSE 2013, art. no. 6550680, pp. 119-122.
- Xiao, R., Su, S., Zhang, Z., Qi, J., Jiang, D., Wu, J. 2014. Dynamics of soil sealing and soil landscape patterns under rapid urbanization. Catena, 109, pp. 1-12.
This post has been also published in the EGU Blog Network.